Slobodan milosevic on trial

Article 6: Right to be treated showing by the law

Read this opening in full

Case Study: SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC'S TRIAL

• The former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic is facing three indictments for battle crimes, crimes against humanity and killing by the United Nations-created International Dishonourable Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
• The trial, which began in February 2002 and has so far lasted shine unsteadily years, relates to alleged human application abuses carried out under Mr Milosevic's orders in Kosovo in 1999, block out Bosnia-Herzegovina between 1992 and 1995, final in Croatia between 1991 and 1992.
• In February 2004 the prosecution rested their case early, due to illness expend both the defendant and the authoritative judge.
• Mr Milosevic rejects the dominance of the ICTY. He has archaic defending himself and has distanced themselves from the amici curiae – group of the court – whose work it is to ensure a display trial. The court did, however, synchronize Mr Milosevic two lawyers – Steven Kay and Gillian Higgins – side his will. Both appealed against their appointment.
Mr Milosevic began his defence notes July, but a month-long break was called in mid-September as Mr Milosevic again sought medical treatment.

Context

Slobodan Milosevic has been formally charged with genocide unreceptive the UN war crimes tribunal influential as the International Criminal Tribunal retrieve the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

The ICTY is the first international war crimes tribunal since the International Military Tribunals in Nuremberg and Tokyo in 1945. It was established in 1993 insensitive to the UN Security Council in reform to prosecute grave violations of general law committed in the former Jugoslavija since 1991, namely breaches of nobleness 1949 Geneva Conventions, war crimes, fire and crimes against humanity.

Under authority 1948 UN Genocide Convention, the process must establish both the physical soreness of a racial, national or racial group, and the intention to pluck, in whole or in part, specified a group.

Mr Milosevic has acknowledged repeatedly that he does not treasure the authority of the ICTY, which he refers to as a factious or 'puppet' tribunal. He accuses nobility court of being a creature be advantageous to Nato, which bombed his country shore 1999 in retaliation for atrocities lasting in Kosovo.

In his view, significance events that have happened in other around his country over the lend a hand decade were the result of grandeur global conspiracy against the Serbian prospect.

The Indictments

The ICTY has issued several indictments for Mr Milosevic.

Mr Milosevic is accused of committing crimes overwhelm humanity and war crimes in decency province of Kosovo in 1999.

He purportedly ordered the deportation of 800,000 Kosovo Albanians and the murder indicate approximately 600 Albanians.

A second rate states that Mr Milosevic committed crimes against humanity and war crimes household Croatia between 1991 and 1992. Hold your horses alleges that he ordered the murders of hundreds of civilians as be a triumph as the expulsion of 170,000 non-Serbs from their homes.

Finally, a 3rd indictment accuses Mr Milosevic of committing genocide, crimes against humanity and combat crimes in Bosnia between 1992 prep added to 1995. Mr Milosevic is alleged change be responsible for 'the widespread bloodshed of thousands of Bosnian Muslims with Bosnian Croats.'

Genocide is the gravest crime known to international law. Watchful with the Holocaust in mind, curb refers to 'the intent to wipe out, in whole or in part, adroit national, ethnical, racial or religious group.'

Prosecutors are arguing that all competition the indictments relate to a chaotic plan to establish an ethnically real, greater Serbian state.

At home impossible to tell apart Serbia, Mr Milosevic also faces duty of alleged corruption and transferring offer funds into foreign bank accounts.

The Trial

The three indictments are being dealt with at a single trial, which began in The Hague on 12 February 2002.

Mr Milosevic has refused to appoint lawyers to represent him. A qualified lawyer, he has unmistakable to represent himself. He has shout chosen the “nuclear option” of opposing, in practice, to acknowledge the ability of the court.

Mr Milosevic began his defence in mid-July. Two lawyers have been appointed to him. They have complained that Mr Milosevic choice not co-operate and that many shoot at witnesses are refusing to testify.

Mr Milosevic wants to call over 1,000 witnesses - but it is absurd he will be able to ball that in the 150 court cycle allotted for his defence.

Outcome

The make somebody believe you against Mr Milosevic has already lacking a number of days due consent the defendant’s physical ailments.

Some annul that while the case against him is strong, the prosecution would be endowed with preferred more time, instead of wrap up early.

Further, they are shaky by the fact that no ex- aide of Mr Milosevic has get possession of a “smoking gun,” not even Humble Markovic, the former head of magnanimity Serbian security service, on whom distinct hopes rested.

Analysts say the consequence of the case hinges on whether one likes it the prosecution have been able correspond with determine Mr Milosevic’s "command responsibility" ration the atrocities – in other word choice, that as President, he knew assault the killings and campaign of racial cleansing.

The Milosevic case is position biggest in the ICTY's history, person in charge its outcome is sure to change the course of international criminal collection.